You can make separate symbol catalogues from the same folder if you haven't split them into subfolders.

Check out page 90 in the Tome for the basics.

If you get stuck, just shout.

Experimentation with rocky bits and patches of possible mud and tundra.

I hope it looks like the village that isn't there yet is on a steep slope.

I got a little more done this evening after work. Quite pleased with the way the terracing has worked out.

Do we have axial tilt and high/low solstice suns?

It affects the naming of the temple at the top of the terraces.

I think I'm more or less finished here, apart from the story. Shout if the labels are too tiny or not easy to see, or if you think I've done something wrong.

Your welcome. It's not often I beat Wyvern to it, but I'm quite impressed with myself for doing it with only 2 fingers on an iPad virtual keyboard!

I think you should do what you want to do.

If you are anything like me, I start something, then realise I should have done it some other way, restart it the other way, then realise it was better the first time around and go back to it. The best things happen by trial and error.

Hi Everyone! :D

In this week's Live Mapping session Ralf will be trying out the latest Cartographer's Annual issue (November 2024) with the Satellite Streets style.

Come along and join us live on Youtube to join in the chat here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ4g_hhSgGU

Or you can watch it here later if you wish.

The sea tools draw on the CONTOURS (SEA) sheet, and are therefore hidden by the land.

You can find the ones you've already drawn by hiding all the other sheets, so you can use the Change Properties tool on them to move them to the WATER/RIVERS sheet.

There are better tools to use to draw more rivers and lakes in the future. Try using one of these two.

The two level mapping is probably the best idea.

You can (if you don't find it too awkward constantly hiding and showing different layers) do largish cities in one map by putting each district on it's own layer and only having the layers you are working on visible.

Yes, things are a bit minimal at the moment, but you are largely correct. This will be more of a large region scale... I think.

However, the suggestions made do still shape the decisions I have to make about what to try for ;)

I still think the castles idea would be much better done as a city style, where you can see such details as differences between 2 castles. However, since this is a top view style there's no reason you can't combine structure symbols to make mega cities.

At the moment I'm working on the textures. They always come first, no matter what style I'm working on.

This is a prototype grassland fill. The trick is to get it textured enough to look like what it's supposed to be, but not so detailed that it becomes a fizzing mash of dots. It has to be a suggestion of grass, rather than the grass itself.

Remember the test mountain is the size of a mountain.