That's wierd! I'm not having that issue myself, even though I archived the whole set of originals before installing the published set to have the same as everyone else (and to be able to see things like this when they occur).

I will investigate...

That looks better!

You can thank Remy for helping me with those textures, by the way ;)

If you mean to make them look like they are floating you could combine the bevel with a drop shadow. The longer the drop shadow effect the higher up they will look.

I would talk to the printer and ask to see some samples. Any printer worth the money will have a set of the same image printed on different media.

For your part, I would make sure that you aren't about to print anything that is too enlarged for it's own good. For example, a lovely bitmap mountain symbol might look fantastic on your screen, even a pretty big screen, but if you print it ten times the size on a piece of paper it will look fuzzy, or pixelated, because there is always a limit as to how large you can print a bitmap fill or a bitmap symbol. A3 and sharp is better on your wall in a nice frame, than A2 and all blurry and pixelated.

A lovely map, Ricko :)

Well? We're pros at this game :)

I'm not sure I know what cyberpunk is supposed to look like, but it's a nice tidy map :)

To do that you would need to duplicate the existing grass fill by opening the Fill Style Properties dialog, selecting the grass fill, clicking new, and giving it a slightly different name. Then you can change the scale settings for the second grass fill without affecting the original one.

Don't forget that if you want something like the grass on the left but not the same, maybe a slightly different colour, I think there are a couple of other similar fills in the same style as that one. Or you can use that same fill and use sheet effects to change it's colour, maybe.

It looks blighted enough to me :)

Is that deliberate blighting, or just something that happened with the underlying grass textures?