KertDawg
KertDawg
About
- Username
- KertDawg
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,192
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, ProFantasy
- Points
- 364
- Birthday
- February 16, 1978
- Location
- NC, USA
- Website
- https://playbyweb.com
- Real Name
- Kertis Henderson
- Rank
- Surveyor
- Badges
- 6
Reactions
-
What art programs do you use?
-
Why are Bitmaps so HUGE
@Loopysue you just saved me lots of time in the future. Thanks!
-
WINE installer error -any ideas?
(This is for future people searching for this topic. I don't want CC3+ to come across as anything but stable to those looking in from the outside.)
- Yes, it was exactly that straightforward for me.
- The "tin" never promised WINE.
- CC3+ has been very stable for me in a few different situations including WINE on a Macbook. Actually, it's been 2 Macbooks, since I migrated CC3+ to a new model recently.
Again, this is for future people searching for "CC3 in WINE." It works well for me.
-
Community atlas - Tombs
-
The map of GnoccoCON '24, a local gaming event
-
WINE installer error -any ideas?
-
Community Atlas - Fonlorn Archipelago - Bleakness - Death Forest.
-
Your favourite settings? (worlds)
The timing was bad, I'll agree. One can't deny Loraine Williams' motives either. However, on its own and apart from other TSR properties, it was good. It was unique. I saw it at a hobby shop and thought it was the first pulp sci-fi setting for a system that I knew well. It had adventures, modules, maps, novels, and video games. It got a lot of bad feelings, I think, because it was different. It was not for fantasy people, and it wasn't for cyberpunk people. It was what Conan was to Middle Earth: gritty. If you strip away the business side and the large leap from Forgotten Realms, I think it's a great pulp sci-fi setting on its own.
-
XP Dialog Box
-
CC3+ and CPUs
Monsen is completely right. CC doesn't use any of the fancy differences between the two. I'd like to point out that the 7600 is 0.2GHz faster. The clock speed is probably the only difference between the two relating to CC3+. That probably won't be a noticeable difference. The 7600 might be faster by 4.4% at most. It's almost backward: the cheaper processor would run CC3+ better.




