7.04!?! That's loyalty!

(I tried to trim the quote, but it's not working on Android Chrome.)

(This is for future people searching for this topic. I don't want CC3+ to come across as anything but stable to those looking in from the outside.)

1. Yes, it was exactly that straightforward for me.
2. The "tin" never promised WINE.
3. CC3+ has been very stable for me in a few different situations including WINE on a Macbook. Actually, it's been 2 Macbooks, since I migrated CC3+ to a new model recently.

Again, this is for future people searching for "CC3 in WINE." It works well for me.

This is a monumental task, and you should be commended. It's a very nice thing to do. As a bonus, you get to have fun making a map! Good show.

OK, I was imagining the Heron formula for calculating the area of a triangle. Your idea makes more sense!

I'm not sure it would help much, but I did something similar in XP. It's not the same thing, but perhaps a similar kind of problem. The distance formula isn't used, I think, but it could be done very easily in C.

This is ProFantasy's Black Friday!

I think the first one is excellent. They're both good, but the first one made me look again a few times. The waterfalls look great.

Turbo speed can be automatic or manual depending on the motherboard and drivers.

Monsen is completely right. CC doesn't use any of the fancy differences between the two. I'd like to point out that the 7600 is 0.2GHz faster. The clock speed is probably the only difference between the two relating to CC3+. That probably won't be a noticeable difference. The 7600 might be faster by 4.4% at most. It's almost backward: the cheaper processor would run CC3+ better.

This is great! I'm not familiar with this setting, I think. Where can I see more about this place? Thanks.

I love this. What is your con named after? I imagine it to be named after my favorite food...