Oh dear. Wow. The "Direct Download" from Humble Bundle is markedly different from the ProFantasy web site. I never used the HB direct links, so I didn't see what you saw. I very strongly suggest that you copy your HB keys and paste them into your Registration -> Downloads page, and then download the installers from there. I'm not sure if they just renamed the installers or if anything else changed. I personally wouldn't trust a download from anywhere but ProFantasy.

The ProFantasy route also has the benefit of always being there if you forget your keys, lose the installer, lose the SM PDF, or want an update.

(This is for future people searching for this topic. I don't want CC3+ to come across as anything but stable to those looking in from the outside.)

1. Yes, it was exactly that straightforward for me.
2. The "tin" never promised WINE.
3. CC3+ has been very stable for me in a few different situations including WINE on a Macbook. Actually, it's been 2 Macbooks, since I migrated CC3+ to a new model recently.

Again, this is for future people searching for "CC3 in WINE." It works well for me.

Here's what I started with:

The following output is completely from CC3. I cropped it to just the section that I needed, then I added a crumpled paper on a new sheet, added transparency, and then did a custom RGB matrix for the entire thing. It's not 100% sepia, but more like halfway. I saved the matrix so I won't have to remember anything. It fits my needs right now.

Thanks all for the ideas and support!

Again?!?

Beautiful, Ralf. Do you have any advice on internationalization of a map? It would be nice to hit a button and change the language used, as in a string table in some software.

This is great! This map is so good that it makes me question the scenario, not the artistry. For instance, are there tracks around here? What about old fire pits? I can believe this is a real place. Great job.

OK, I was imagining the Heron formula for calculating the area of a triangle. Your idea makes more sense!

I'm not sure it would help much, but I did something similar in XP. It's not the same thing, but perhaps a similar kind of problem. The distance formula isn't used, I think, but it could be done very easily in C.

I think the first one is excellent. They're both good, but the first one made me look again a few times. The waterfalls look great.

Turbo speed can be automatic or manual depending on the motherboard and drivers.

Monsen is completely right. CC doesn't use any of the fancy differences between the two. I'd like to point out that the 7600 is 0.2GHz faster. The clock speed is probably the only difference between the two relating to CC3+. That probably won't be a noticeable difference. The 7600 might be faster by 4.4% at most. It's almost backward: the cheaper processor would run CC3+ better.