@Ralf will have to confirm this, but I suspect the missing fills are just due to poor cleaning of the template. None of those missing fills appears in any of the drawing tools for the style. That list is full of things that don't belong there.

As explained in my initial post, I assume that everyone who posted their .fcw file here in the contest thread intended to submit them to the atlas. (If you misunderstood that part, and do NOT wish to contribute to the atlas, please tell me)

Several contestants here are new contributors to the atlas, and I need to know what name to credit the map to, as well as contact information (such as an email address, or a web site with contact information, facebook profile. etc.). By default, I will use your forum username as the credited name, and set the contact information to "username at the ProFantasy forums". If you want these to appear as anything else, please reply here, or send me a private message. There's also room on the mapper list on the webpage to include a URL beside your name, so if you have a relevant web page or gallery link or similar, you can also give me that. If you're actively using the gallery here at the forum, that could for example be a URL to your gallery page here.

That means that either the navlines or the landmass is on the wrong sheet, or your sheet order is wrong. Check the sheets of the entities with the Info menu -> List command, and make sure the sheet for the navlines appear higher up in the sheet list than the sheet for the landmass.

And for the record, the rest of the contest maps and other maps in queue will follow, I just don't have time to do everything at once. I did this set first because the 500th map was among them, and as you will notice if you visit the atlas site, we are over 500 now.

The submission from @Tex has now been processed. Thanks for taking part.

@JimP I tried to process yours too, but the zip file you attached only contained the description, and not the map file.

And another map in the atlas. This time it is @MattyEH's map. Thanks for participating in the contest and contributing to the atlas.

Three new maps from the contest included in the atlas. This time it is all new levels for our mega dungeon project.

Thanks to @MarkOlsen and @JimP for participating and contributing.

I disagree here. Those artistic maps do serve a real purpose in my games. I'm not that good of a descriptive storyteller, and an artistic map helps cover that up quite a bit. It lets me and the players agree on the look of the location, instead of they forming a very different image in their heads based on my limited description that they have. An artistic map can much more easily contain locations that may or may not be interesting which I love when showing it to the players, it's not as clear-cut as those traditional monochrome maps.

That said, if I am not showing it to the players, I am usually not mapping it at all. Most of the cities my players have visited don't have a map at all, because I don't need one. A simple list of locations is more than enough. Heck, even a lot of the dungeons don't have maps. I don't waste time mapping locations I don't need a map for. But if you feel you need a map for a location just for yourself, then yea, keeping it as simple as possible is good.

Considering this is a generic underwater style, and not made for a specific setting, I think it is safe to ignore things like breathing, just assume that any DM who is using an underwater style have a way in the system they are using to handle that issue.

If anyone wants to arrange such a challenge, feel free to do so. While I don't have the skills required, I'd love to see a competition going on for those that have, and maybe there will be some nice results for everyone to use.

But I think Shessar is right. If you force a specific style, you will be excluding lots of otherwise skilled people. While the symbols produced will be less usable overall because they don't have a single style, it wil allow everyone involved to do their best instead of being forced to try to emulate some one else's style.

My suggestion would be to introduce a theme though, such as "dungeon treasure" or "modern supermarket" or "overland trees" to both give people ideas and constrain it somewhat without being to limiting.

And I don't think splitting it into vector and raster symbols is a good idea. You're already cutting deep into the possible participants when you go from maps to symbols, so splitting even more isn't wise IMHO.