Great it worked out for you. Smooth polys require more computer resources to render, so avoiding them on complex entities is preferable, but of course, depending on the map, one may want the slightly nicer look.

No, inlays.

Looks great, but you seem to have attached the image instead of inserting it into the post....

Just edit your post, remove the attachment, and insert the image using the image button.

Personally, I think you are using too fancy a font for those smaller labels. Fancy fonts are difficult to read and look cluttered easily, even if they are thematic. I would recommend sticking with simple fonts for those.

You may also wish to try some color differences to isolate those larger area-spanning labels from the others.

@Rob Webber I recommend you contact technical support for a quicker response.

You're welcome. The snap grid is really your best friend when trying to do precision work.

People have different ways of doing things. Myself, I prefer to export the the CC3+ landmass directly from FT (as in the video).

Posted By: Stephan72My problem is now figuring out how to customize the map now that I've got it in CC3+.

Change Like Draw Tool is your friend here.

Is that indicative of a typical journey with SJ?

The actual rendering issue MAY be caused what we call transparency acne, but it was difficult to see on your screenshot, which is why I also asked you if it was different if you tried a 5k square export instead of a 10k. Basically, TA can happen on entities with an edge fade or bevel effect where some of the colors of the fill are identical to the background below them. This can cause "holes" in the texture at the points where they are identical, and the edge fade effect then extends these holes, sometimes to the point of the original texture almost disappearing. If it is TA, one way to work around it is to put another entity (a copy of the top one, with another fill, such as a solid color) on a sheet sandwiched between the two holding the entities.