@OwlishlyTaboo i have same perception of @Wyvern on #3.

When this situation happen to me - and is most part of the time, i adjust the proportion not by numbers but by visual (not zooming in), simple way: i select a mountain, hill etc already placed and compare with the new selected one.

When i get the "correct proportion" i continue mapping.

in last few weeks i start a new usual behaviour in those situations, i write on paper all main sizes (and color number used... plus you can add size/color records to background, medium ground and fore ground on map):

back ground middle ground (optional) fore ground (optional)

mountain : 0,5 color 35

hills : 0.4 color 37

tree : 0.35 XXX

city : XXXX XXX

This helps me remind fast witch size/color i use as base refference in a great size scenario.

Nice Work mate, keep on!

Cheers

Vacations and rain = maps :)

A small town in the middle of Argentina.

Names are translated literal. Behind the might Comechingones Mountains.

Used Mr. Mike Schley classical town images.

Cheers

its nice idea, but in this map i selected sea as first back ground to use at same time as sky and river.

Just added symbols and then a small portion of land on low border... i forgot to use edge stripes.

Cheers

trying a style between high and small landscape view using Ancient Realms.

cheers

this is the image on cc3+ with sheet efects on, and dont appear this bug.