Won't help you now that you got it working, but I should probably put this into a blog article for future users.

Well, there are a few less entities, so it would be marginally faster, but in practice, nothing you would notice.

Thanks.

I developed that template under VS19, which is why it probably requires it by default, but it doesn't really take advantage of any new features or anything.

Technically, there is no reason at all to use VS19 for XP development, but it happened to be ready for release at about the same time as my first blog article, so I decided to use that, since that was the version people would find at the MS download site. I actually wrote the blog article while using the beta version, and released it on the same day VS19 was released.

If things look different inside CC3+ when compared to an export, that is usually a fill or effect scaling issue. If fills are not scaled, or if effects are scaled to view size, the output will be different since the "view" during an export is very different from the normal view.

Size of the export (in pixels) also matters a bit of course.

Looks like the regular selection indicators. As long as you are not inside an actual command and actively have these selected, it should go away with a click on :CC2REDRAW:, or in very rare cases, select something else first, such as draw a temporary line, then :CC2ERASE: it (since this involves selecting it) and then do :CC2REDRAW:.

Nicely done. These are good maps. That road in the top map looks like it could be improved with a bit of an edge fade though, or something else to break up that very hard edge.

Sure. What resolution do you want them exported in? The ones in the forum where exported in 2000 x 1500, the ones in the gallery 8000 x 6000

Yes. It is not defined as a style in CC3+, but the symbols are all there, and the rest is just (fractal) lines.

Nice. Is the place as happy as the color scheme infers, or are there some dark intrigue hiding in the shadows here?

I get the 'zoomed far out' behavior (looks like the zoom is set to fit the default 1000x800 map size, and don't zoom in automatically to the smaller template), but not any other issues.

You'll probably be able to fix it by editing the actual template itself, set a snap grid there and save it.

Works perfectly fine for me too. And I checked the source code of the website, the link is as a plain standard link as they gets, no fancy javascript or popups or confirmations or anything weird that could potentially fail, it is just a link straight to the file.

I would recommend you try a different browser.